Philip Kitcher on science and philosophy
Michael De Dora
Posted on June 13, 2012
I’m traveling for work today, so I don’t have much time for a post, but if you have a couple minutes, take a look at this interesting — and, in my opinion, important — new article from Columbia University philosopher of science Philip Kitcher:
We are finite beings, and so our investigations have to be selective, and the broadest frameworks of today’s science reflect the selections of the past. What we discover depends on the questions taken to be significant, and the selection of those questions, as well as the decision of which factors to set aside in seeking answers to them, presupposes judgments about what is valuable. Those are not only, or mainly, scientific judgments. In their turn, new discoveries modify the landscape in which further investigations will take place, and because what we learn affects how evidence is assessed, discovery shapes the evolution of our standards of evidence. Judgments of value thus pervade the environment in which scientific work is done. If they are made, as they should be, in light of the broadest and deepest reflections on human life and its possibilities, then good science depends on contributions from the humanities and the arts. Perhaps there is even a place for philosophy.
Tagged: ethics, humanities, philosophy, science, scientism