Traditional marriage: not so traditional
Michael De Dora
Posted on May 18, 2012
Anyone who pays attention to politics has heard conservatives and religious believers argue that marriage is — and always has been — a relationship between one man and one woman, and thus, that same-sex marriage should be illegal.
Here’s the problem: marriage has not always been a relationship between one man and one woman.
Time to break out your Bible … Abraham had two wives, Sarah and her handmaiden Hagar. King Solomon had 700 wives, plus 300 concubines and slaves. Jacob, the patriarch who gives Israel its name, had two wives and two concubines. In a humanist vein, Exodus 21:10 warns that when men take additional wives, they must still provide for their previous one. (Exodus 21:16 adds that if a man seduces a virgin and has sex with her, he has to marry her, too.)
But that’s not all. In biblical society, when you conquered another city, tribe, or nation, the victorious men would “win” their defeated foes’ wives as part of the spoils. It also commanded levirate marriage, the system wherein, if a man died, his younger brother would have to marry his widow and produce heirs with her who would be considered the older brother’s descendants. Now that’s traditional marriage!
And that’s just the Bible. Click here to keep reading the long, sordid history of “traditional marriage.”
You’ll be shocked to know that Janet Jacob Erickson worked for the Heritage Foundation as well as the Ruth Institute, NOM’s “scholarly” affiliate, where she showed her “love” for gay people by claiming that they abused their children, made them gay, were inherently promiscuous and disease ridden. I’ve had plenty of that “love” from the family values crowd most of my life – the only reason they are softening their tactics and trying to play themselves as victims is that they know they have lost the culture war.